Given a thesis or statement which intends to condemn present day reality and facts.
Could you argue for this thesis without using present day reality and facts?
       If used as an argument, present day reality and facts will condemn any thesis which
       condemns them.
       Furthermore, an argument which supports a thesis will in turn appear supported by
       the thesis.
       Thus it may happen that you support that which you wish to condemn.
How could you, without using present day reality and facts as an argument, argue for this thesis
without becoming a composer?

In the system which perpetuates it, an unsolvable problem is just that.

Traces(20)			Beginning